Posts

The Whitefield School child abuse scandal: the five big issues that remain unresolved

BBC reporter: ‘You’re sure that his time in these calming rooms changed him?’ Mother: ‘Yes, very much so. He went in as a calm, sweet, innocent child, and he’s come out of there not even being able to function in his daily activities. He needs support with everything now…and basically…He won’t leave the house’. The Whitefield School child abuse scandal is without doubt the most shocking in Waltham Forest’s modern times, involving as it does allegations that in the years 2014 to 2017 staff subjected about 40 children with learning difficulties and severe mental disorders to violence and degradation. Such a terrible episode has attracted much comment (includ... »

Whitefield latest: in August 2024 LBWF and partners initiated a statutory review of the school’s historic child abuse scandal, but incredibly it’s yet to report

In August 2024, LBWF and its various safeguarding partners initiated a Local Child Safeguarding Practice Review (LCSPR) to examine the historic child abuse at Whitefield School, and this was then publicly announced by the Leader, Cllr. Grace Williams, on 27 November 2024, one day after the BBC’s Noel Titheradge had published the third of his devastating exposés (‘CCTV…obtained by the BBC shows autistic children being shoved into padded rooms, thrown to the floor, restrained by the neck – or left alone, sitting in vomit’).       According to the mandatory guidance, Working Together to Safeguard Children, the findings of LCSPRs must be published ’n... »

LBWF’s commitment to being transparent again in question as campaigner finds c.£500,000 unaccounted for in audit documents signed off by the council’s senior leadership

In recent years LBWF has repeatedly failed to uphold its responsibility to be open and transparent, even where this is required by the law. A few examples are illustrative (for further details see the links below). In 2020, the Information Commissioner’s Office took the almost unprecedented step of issuing LBWF with a Practice Recommendation because of its widespread non-compliance with the Freedom of Information Act. Four years later, LBWF was revealed to have blatantly ignored the mandatory requirements of the 2015 Local Government Transparency Code, legislation that was specifically designed, as accompanying blurb explained, ‘to place more power into citizens’ hands to increase democratic... »

LBWF gets peer reviewed…but are the results credible?

In 2024, LBWF volunteered itself for a Local Government Association (LGA) Corporate Peer Challenge (CPC), that is an audit by a team of ‘senior local government councillors and officers’ from outside the borough. How did this work out? It’s worth noting to start with that opinions about CPCs differ. For the LGA, a CPC is ‘a highly valued improvement and assurance tool that is delivered by the sector for the sector’. Several senior LBWF councillors clearly agree, with Clyde Loakes, Marie Pye, and Grace Williams, amongst others, having been involved in CPC teams. However, elsewhere, there are qualms.  The idea itself may not be a bad one, it is conceded, as outsiders sometimes see flaws a... »

LBWF’s new back office Oracle Fusion networking platform: management miracle or cash drain?

In December 2021 LBWF decided to modernise its back office by installing a cloud based networking platform made by the leading American company Oracle (‘Big Red’). Subsequently, this innovation has been described as a management triumph, responsible for integrating ways of working across the Town Hall. However, as is often the case with LBWF, careful research reveals a more complicated picture, with successes, true, but also problems, the latter now requiring repeated amounts of additional cash. The story begins in 2003, the year that LBWF purchased a networking platform made by the German company SAP. This linked together the finance, procurement, human resources and business support depart... »

Page 1 of 93123»