Posts

LBWF repeatedly claims it is taking residents’ complaints seriously…but just as repeatedly fails to do so

November 18, 2025 Freedom of Information Act, Mark Hynes, Ombudsman 0

In the last few years, LBWF has repeatedly claimed that it is taking residents’ complaints seriously, and learning from them, explaining: ‘Complaints are an important way for an organisation to be accountable to the public, as well as providing valuable insights into organisational performance and the conduct of staff providing services to residents in order to drive improvement in service delivery’. Of course, many big corporates make similar noises, it’s become fashionable. Yet in this particular case, there is reason to be circumspect, because LBWF rhetoric is one thing, reality sometimes quite another.   This post takes a c... »

, ,

LBWF, the Whitefield School abuse victims, and their special needs care plans: a discreditable failure, and one that reflects wider truths about local child safeguarding

October 24, 2025 child safeguarding, Whitefield 0

As previously noted, the January 2017 Ofsted report on Whitefield was the first to reveal the abuse that children had suffered in the school’s ‘calming rooms’ (see links), and it is no surprise to find that much subsequent discussion has focused on the same topic. However, the Ofsted report also made other observations about Whitefield, and one that deserves more attention than it has so far received is the following: ‘Leaders [at the school] were unable to show how parents and other professionals were made aware that pupils had been placed in… [the ‘calming rooms’]. Individual behaviour plans, EHC plans and pupils’ files do not include enough information about the use of these rooms. This h... »

,

Hate crime in Waltham Forest update: LBWF and the police still treat it as a key priority, but the facts don’t support them

October 15, 2025 Policing/crime 0

In February 2023, a post on this blog examined hate crime in Waltham Forest, and queried why LBWF and the local police force was treating it as a key priority, worthy of enhanced financial and administrative support (see links, below). What follows looks at what has happened subsequently. Hate crime has continued to be prioritised. But are the doubts of earlier years also still present? First, a summary of the basic evidence. The only comprehensive series about hate crime is data collected by the police, and for the period February 2023 to September 2025 for Waltham Forest this reveals the following. (a) The volume of recorded hate crime has varied, with peaks and troughs, but there is no di... »

As a programme to retrain the Town Hall’s frontline managers is revealed to have been deeply flawed, doubts again surface about how LBWF spends public money

September 26, 2025 EDI 0

In the past few years LBWF has vigorously pursued an equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) agenda aimed at transforming its internal culture, an agenda that has involved all employees, from top to bottom; cost thousands of pounds; and, because delivered via various kinds of training, eaten up significant amounts of staff time. Little has been said about this agenda in public, but Freedom of Information requests have begun to uncover some of the details (see link, below). One very pertinent issue is whether the agenda has benefited either those working in the Town Hall or, more importantly, those providing the funding – local residents. Here, the evidence so far is very thin, but ther... »

Cathall Labour Councillor Jonathan O’Dea dropped as a candidate at next year’s local elections: is it because he has spoken publicly about the Whitefield child abuse scandal?

September 19, 2025 Whitefield 0

In the past few weeks, the Waltham Forest Echo has reported extensively on the deselection of longstanding Cathall Councillor Jonathan O’Dea. Earlier this year, the paper reveals, Cllr. O’Dea applied to stand again for Labour in next year’s local elections, but on the advice of the party’s Chief Whip, Cllr. Steve Terry, was turned down. Cllr. O’Dea was told that what counted against him was his poor campaigning record, and the fact that he had submitted a motion to the local Labour Party calling for a ceasefire in Gaza at a time when this was frowned upon. Cllr. O’Dea believed that the evidence fully refuted both these points, and so appealed, but was again rejected. Reflecting on ... »

Page 1 of 92123›»