Posts

LBWF Leader Clare Coghill’s MIPIM muddle (1)

August 7, 2017 Cllr. Clare Coghill, Redevelopment

In 2012, the Waltham Forest Guardian reported that councillors were finding the requirement that they fill in and then update their register of interest forms to be challenging. Some had missed out crucial details, with, for example, the Leader, Chris Robbins, neglecting to mention his family home. Others – incredibly – overlooked their party membership. A few had simply failed to keep their forms up to date. In response, LBWF stated that it was introducing ‘a new website’ which would ‘be easier to use, with less duplicated information’. On the quiet, it also trimmed what councillors in future had to declare. I was reminded of this amusing episode when compiling the previous post on LB... »

London Borough of Waltham Forest:  ‘a property empire with a sideline in local government’?*

August 2, 2017 Cllr. Clare Coghill, Fred Wigg and John Walsh Towers, LBWF, Redevelopment, the Labour Party in Waltham Forest

In March 2016, then portfolio holder for economic growth and high streets, now Group Leader, Clare Coghill travelled to Cannes in the company of LBWF CEO Martin Esom and ‘Assistant Director, Investment and Delivery’ Jonathan Martin, to attend Marché International des Professionnels de l’Immobilier (MIPIM), ‘the world’s leading real estate event for property professionals’. Their mission? To sell investment opportunities in Waltham Forest to the assembled movers and shakers. No record exists as to whether Cllr. Coghill et al. were successful, but it is surely significant that subsequently they have attended several similar events. The more jaundiced may see MIPIM as a rather unattractive joll... »

, , , , ,

St. Mary’s Primary School, Walthamstow, and asbestos: the final verdict (2)

July 27, 2017 Asbestos at St. Mary's School, Martin Esom

Lest there be any doubt about the matter, this excerpt from AEC Ltd, “Independent Report on the Potential Risk of Exposure to Asbestos during Refurbishment Works in 2011 at St Mary’s School Walthamstow” (NPSL, 2013), p.6 demonstrates that LBWF had overall responsibility for what went on at St. Mary’s, and also (according to AEC) specific culpability for the events that led to the likely exposure of workers to asbestos, and eventually the HSE prosecution: »

,

St. Mary’s Primary School, Walthamstow, and asbestos: the final verdict (1)

July 26, 2017 Asbestos at St. Mary's School, Martin Esom, Town Hall asbestos

The Waltham Forest Guardian‘s Tom Barnes has just filed an online story reporting that, following a prosecution brought by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE),  Balfour Beatty Regional Construction, NPS London Ltd., and Squibb Group Ltd. today have been fined in all over £1m. for breaking various safety regulations in connection with the removal of asbestos at St Mary’s Church of England Primary School in Walthamstow during 2012. I first found out about events at St Mary’s when I was investigating the fiasco surrounding the treatment of asbestos in the Town Hall (see references appended), and was particularly appalled by the stark contents of the various reports that I ob... »

, ,

Policing in Waltham Forest: performance

July 19, 2017 Policing/crime

This post turns from its predecessor’s focus on police priorities to police performance. For reasons that are unclear, the most up to date figures borough by borough on number of offences and related sanction detection rates (SDRs) are no longer widely circulated, but some careful searching has unearthed the table appended below. The series therein largely speak for themselves, and paint a rather uninspiring picture. In fact, focusing on the 41 Waltham Forest SDRs for 2016-17 (the extreme right hand column), 34, or 83 per cent, are worse than in the preceding year. And placing Waltham Forest in a relative perspective only marginally modifies the overall impression. Again focusing on the 2016... »

Page 55 of 89«‹5354555657›»