Posts

The Whitefield Local Child Safeguarding Practice Review (3): Leigh Day now pursuing civil claims including against the London Borough of Waltham Forest, and related press coverage

August 2, 2026 LCSPR, Whitefield 0

(1) Part of Leigh Day’s press release, posted on 30 July 2026: (2) Marco Marcelline in the Waltham Forest Echo, dated 30 July 2026: https://walthamforestecho.co.uk/2026/07/30/council-buried-whitefield-abuse-report-after-schools-legal-threat/   (3) Jonathan Ames in The Times, dated 31 July 2026:   (4) Noel Titheradge, the journalist who firsts broke the Whitefield story, for the BBC, dated 31 July 2026: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq89757z9vyo »

,

The Whitefield Local Child Safeguarding Practice Review (2): more confusion and controversies

July 31, 2026 LCSPR, Whitefield 0

Further to an earlier post (see links) there are two additional points that are worth making about the contents of the Whitefield Local Child Safeguarding Practice Review (LCSPR). The first concerns what appears to be some confusion about basic facts. At paragraph 1.2, right at the start of the document, the LCSPR describes how, in 2014-17, children were locked in the ‘calming rooms’ for ‘prolonged periods of seclusion’, and subject to ‘inappropriate physical restraint’ and ‘other restrictive and harmful practices’. Plus, it continues, this went on without attracting much, if any, attention: ‘The review found no evidence of direct concerns raised by ... »

,

Burnham-ism: a warning from (Waltham Forest) history

July 23, 2026 Independent Panel, LBWF spin, The BNI, Uncategorized 0

Yes, definitely, let’s devolve power and money to the localities, because ‘communities know better than anyone else what’s right for them’. Power to the people! What could possibly go wrong? Well, if this story is to be believed, plenty. In the early 2000s, the government gave LBWF many millions of public money to help the most deprived neighbourhoods in the borough. Now read on. Postscript It’s important to add that the police did not act on my complaint, and accordingly it should be underlined that none of those mentioned in this article were found to have engaged in any kind of illegal activity. However, it turned out that this was the first shot in what was a long campaign, a campa... »

The Whitefield Local Child Safeguarding Practice Review (1): what it says, what it – very regrettably – overlooks, and why it fails

July 20, 2026 LCSPR, Whitefield 0

This post looks in some detail at the recently published Local Child Safeguarding Practice Review (LCSPR) regarding the historic child abuse at Whitefield School (or, to give it its formal title ‘Learning from the past: The use of restrictive practices, including seclusion, in a school for children with additional needs’). First, a couple of observations about how the LCSPR was set up and then actioned. There has been some confusion about timings, but the following is the current best guess. LBWF and partners decided to set up the LCSPR in August 2024; the then Leader, Cllr. Grace Williams, announced their decision publicly three months later; and the LCSPR was commissioned in April 2025. Th... »

,

The Review into historic child abuse at Whitefield is due out next week, but questions persist about which organisations kept vital evidence, and which didn’t

July 3, 2026 LCSPR, Whitefield 0

It is said that the Local Child Safeguarding Practice Review (LCSPR) into child abuse at Whitefield School during 2014-17 finally will be released next week, having taken an astonishing 16 months longer than the official guidance recommends. However, even at this eleventh hour, research is still revealing new concerns about the existence of evidence relating to the abuse, and the following looks at one significant example. Since the passing of the Children Act in 2004, all schools in Waltham Forest (as everywhere else) have been required to complete an annual safeguarding audit, referred to as a Section11 after the relevant paragraph in the legislation, and return it to the Town Hall. As LBW... »

,
Page 1 of 96123›»